Sarah Atkinson, CEO of the Social Mobility Foundation and Department for Opportunities, said:
We are increasingly concerned about the implications of this year’s exam results for disadvantaged young people. Despite Ofqual’s statement that the A-Level attainment gap had remained stable, the data released thereafter told a starkly different story. 
The record number of high grades have been disproportionately awarded in private schools. Those receiving an A or above at A-Level up 9.3 percentage points compared with 6.2 percentage points in state schools.  Pupils in disadvantaged areas of Scotland are twice as likely to have seen their grades fall at Higher and Advanced Higher.  Clearly, we are seeing the gap between low-income pupils and their more affluent peers widening right across the UK which is huge cause for concern.
Individuals taking vocational qualifications have not seen the same grade increases. Given the proportion of lower-income pupils enrolled in these routes, the gap and increased competition with A-Level students could have huge implications for social mobility. 
There are geographical inequalities too: London saw a 7.2 percentage point jump in A-Level grades at A or above, with an increase of just 3.6 percentage points in the North East.  Regional differences also apply to university access, with those from under-represented areas experiencing lower levels of entry. 
The extent of this grade variation has confirmed our stance throughout the pandemic: that disadvantaged young people have consistently suffered more adversity compared to their more privileged peers.
Without targeted action that focuses on helping young people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds thrive in education and work, we risk holding back so many young people from reaching their full potential.
We again call on universities to demonstrate flexibility in the admissions process for the most disadvantaged students, both now and in future years as the instability in the exam system is set to continue. It is an encouraging development that universities will now receive individual-level free school meal data through UCAS which will support them in contextualising admissions. 
Finally, we urge government the Prime Minister to honour his commitment to an ambitious programme of recovery and hope the Chancellor prioritises the most disadvantaged students in new education recovery plans announced in the autumn spending review. Our advocacy arm, the Department for Opportunities, will be soon be setting out detailed policy recommendations, informed directly by young people from low socioeconomic backgrounds. If we continue to stand by as inequality grows then untold potential will be lost.